1,5 million d'évaluations
277 000 évaluations

C'est justement à ça que l'application sert.

Cool Beurk !
sodomyaspraxis
insurrectionarycompassion

TERFs biggest allies in their campaign against trans women have always been the religious right. From Janice Raymond’s work with conservative Reagan era politician Jesse Helms to strip trans people of healthcare to Cathy Brennan’s work with homophobic religious right organization Pacific Justice Institute to run a smear campaign against a trans child: TERFs have always relied on reactionary political institutions to target trans people.

If the literal representatives of the patriarchy agree with you and are willing to collaborate with “feminists” maybe you should rethink why that is and if your politics are actually helping women at all. Even if we buy the argument that trans women are men (which I don’t) then how is working with homophobic right wing men liberatory for women? How is it radical for women to align themselves with patriarchal, homophobic conservatives whose interest here is to erode LGBT and women’s protections in general (and not just for trans women)?

TERFs aren’t actually invested in anything that would further women’s liberation. It’s why they don’t talk about anything other then how much they hate the trannies. They hate us so much they’re willing to sabotage the women’s movement just to hurt us.

Source : insurrectionarycompassion
bunny-butch
bioillogically

before we sincerely start calling ourselves ‘sex negative’ feminists because we don’t like gay men very much are kink-critical and value respectability over the self-determination of actual trauma survivors pro-recovery, we should perhaps consider contemporary ‘sex positive’ feminism as a historical response to certain radical and cultural feminist readings of sex and pornography.

consider the 1990 collection the sexual liberals and the attack on feminism, a single volume which manages to argue:

  • pregnancy is pornographic because it displays to men that a woman is not a virgin (twiss butler, “abortion and pornography: the sexual liberal’s ‘gotcha’ against womens’ equality”)
  • sex between gay men—and butch/femme relationships between gay women—is sadomasochistic, concerned with dominance and submission, and thus, somehow, oppressive to women (sheila jeffreys, “sexology and antifeminism)
  • gay men raping other gay men is an act of violence against women, and sexual abuse of children by women is either non-existent or not something we should worry about (florence rush, “the many faces of backlash”)
  • prophylactic mastectomy for BRCA-positive women, in vitro fertilization, hormonal birth control like depo-provera, and apparently surrogate motherhood all constitute graphic violence against women (gena corea, “the new reproductive technologies”)
  • presented without interpretation: “we believe that homosexuality, pedophilia, lesbianism, bisexuality, transsexuality, transvestism, sadomasochism, nonfeminist celibacy, and autoeroticism have the same malevolent relationship to conceptual and empirical male force as does heterosexuality” (a southern women’s writing collective, “sex resistance in heterosexual arrangements”)

like, the primary association of a ‘sex positive’ feminism shouldn’t be erica moen, it should be resistance to the adoption of homophobic, misogynistic, and otherwise conservative protestant sexual ethics under the banner of women’s liberation.

Source : bioillogically

I recommend everyone go and reread Angela Nagle’s article. Mass migration does drive down wages by increasing the supply of labor, the economics doesn’t lie and the Left has to reckon with that. Meanwhile, we should find the center-left rhetoric on immigration repugnant, illegal immigrants are not a service class “doing work Americans won’t,” we shouldn’t pat ourselves on the back for allowing desperate migrants in and then letting our businesses exploit them as a cheap and unprotected source of labor.

Nagle asks, in the article, to shift the burdon of mass migration to capital and recounts the current going legislative solutions. None of them are exactly optimal or unproblematic but they represent the basis for a solution that considers the cost of migration to the working class. Her main point, however, is that it’s untenable for the Left to uncritically support open borders without a way of holding the government accountable for the economic protection and well-being of immigrants.

Nowhere does she claim that people escaping conflict shouldn’t immigrate, nowhere does she support harsh anti-immigration laws or deportation.

angela nagle immigration
thelesbianscrolls

How anarchist organizers in rural Puerto Rico rebooted their power grid after the privatized power company abandoned them

mostlysignssomeportents

image


After being hammered by hurricane Maria, the residents of the rural Puerto Rican mountain town of Mariana got tired of waiting for the bumbling, privatized, cash-starved power authority to reconnect them to the grid, so the anarchist organizer Christine Nieves founded Proyecto de Apoyo Mutuo, one of a dozen-odd cooperatives across the island to create their own solar grid; by the time the The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority finally put in appearance, Mariana had had power for two whole months.

After Maria, Puerto Rico suffered the second-longest blackout in world history, ignored by both the federal government and the gutted, heavily privatized local government. So community organizers like Nieves took matters into their own hands.

Nieves’s group formed an alliance with the Katrina-inspired Mutual Aid Disaster Relief, which fundraised to send gear to Puerto Rico.

The island-wide efforts are rare bright spots in a year-long crisis with no end in sight. Naturally, they’ve faced police harassment and raids looking for “antifa.”

https://boingboing.net/2018/09/13/better-than-bounty.html

Source : mostlysignssomeportents
lesbianchemicalplant
pure

Lel I just learned a radical feminist group that got attention in the media for transphobia a while back was actually a front for a Christian fundamentalist organization.

pure

This is well researched:

http://transadvocate.com/fake-radical-feminist-group-actually-paid-political-front-for-anti-lgbt-james-dobson-organization_n_20207.htm

Also I said a long time ago that Christians are beginning to use secular arguments to try to justify their attempts at establishing a theocracy…and people on both the left and the right are hand-feeding them this kind of approach.

radical-my-dudes

Wow it’s almost as if actual radfems wouldn’t work with right-wing conservatives

pure

I wish that was the case, but it isn’t…

Cathy Brennan, a radical feminist, collaborated with a Christian fundamentalist group called The Pacific Justice Institute to fabricate a story about a transgender teen who allegedly harassed other students. That claim was debunked by the directors of the school that the teen attended.

And now’s a good time to replug this piece. 

This is an except from an article entitled “Christian Right tips to fight transgender rights: separate the T from the LGB″ by the Southern Poverty Law Center, posted on October 23rd, 2017. I recommend reading the entire article. It details how some radical feminists have actively collaborated with Christian fundamentalists, how some Christian fundamentalists are using radical feminist arguements to push for the religious traditionalism they want the country to adhere to, and it expands upon some of the events referenced in the first article I mentioned in the original post. 

[Meg] Kilgannon [a member of a Christian fundamentalist group: Concerned Parents and Educators of Fairfax County] identified a wide coalition of potential allies outside the Christian Right who could confront trans friendly measures. Here’s her advice on how to draw them in: 

“Explain that gender identity rights only come at the expense of others: women, sexual assault survivors, female athletes forced to compete against men and boys, ethnic minorities who culturally value modesty, economically challenged children who face many barriers to educational success and don’t need another level of chaos in their lives, children with anxiety disorders and the list goes on and on and on.”

The list could almost read like a manifesto for intersectionality, if it weren’t for its exclusion of some key groups, most notably transgender people themselves.

For Kilgannon, an example of effective coalition building [among the Christian Right] includes the Hands Across the Aisle Coalition (HATAC), a group that unites religious and non-religious women to oppose transgender rights. The co-founders of the group are sexual assault survivor Kaeley Triller Haver and lesbian activist and radical feminist Miriam Ben-Shalom, who was discharged from the U.S. Army for declaring herself a lesbian in 1976. This started her decades-long battle against Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

In 2016, Ben-Shalom was disinvited from being the grand marshal of the Milwaukee Pride parade because of her views on trans people and support for so-called “bathroom bills,” which would deny people access to public restrooms and other facilities that match their gender identities. Ben-Shalom claimed to Fox6Now in Milwaukee that “my fight is ensuring that women are safe from the pretenders who might use the trans issue to get in and hurt somebody,” a popular talking point on the anti-LGBT right as a justification for anti-trans bathroom bills.

The group, according to Kilgannon, is mobilizing seemingly progressive rhetoric to oppose transgender rights: in the group, she says:

“The feminists make eloquent arguments that gender identity really is the ultimate misogyny and the erasure of women. And lesbians in the group are concerned that trans and masculine girls is a form of lesbian eugenics.”

With little transparency on its website about who and what formed the group, HATAC might simply be a secular-facing iteration of the same anti-LGBT agenda that has driven the Christian Right for decades. Hands Across the Aisle sent a letter to Ben Carson, director of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, speaking out against the inclusion of trans women at single-sex women’s shelters. Revealingly, the letter’s co-signers (which include Meg Kilgannon) also include Michelle Cretella, the current president of the American College of Pediatricians, an anti-LGBT hate group that pumps out junk science on LGBT people, including attempts to link homosexuality to pedophilia or claims that LGBT people are a danger to children.

The attempt to depict the pushback against nondiscriminatory measures that include transgender people as a feminist struggle (an ironic fact for a movement that often derides feminism) was also embraced by other panelists. Cathy Ruse and Peter Sprigg, both senior fellows for the anti-LGBT hate group Family Research Council embraced this rhetoric. Cathy Ruse, who gave the opening speech of the panel, declared:

“Now what about girls? Did you know that feminists are at odds with the transgender movement? Last year a prominent feminist published a compendium of article under the title of Female Erasure. The subtitle is: what you need to know about gender politics’ war on women, the female sex, and human rights? What is the impact on girls who are bombarded with gender transition messages? In their young minds, do they hear that being female isn’t good enough?”

Peter Sprigg, who peddles myths linking homosexuality to pedophilia and has hinted that homosexuality should be criminalized, also wrapped his intervention in feminist rhetoric, commenting that:

“It’s particularly ironic that as our culture has developed where there is a greater range of choices, of activities, of careers that are available to men and women, boys and girls than there ever was before. And it’s really kind of ridiculous and almost retrograde to assume that we have to identify somebody’s gender identity on the basis of their activities or preferences.”

In many ways, there are possible allies to this pivot toward anti-trans secular movements: trans-exclusionary radical feminists, dubbed TERFs by some activists, have made waves in recent years. Some TERFs have reclaimed the term and redubbed themselves PERFs, penis-exclusionary radical feminists. Their rationale is that people who are assigned male at birth can never experience the same conditions as women do, and still hold on to their male privilege. (The latter becomes harder to prove in the face of the discrimination experienced by trans and gender non-conforming people.) As reported by Political Research Associates, trans-exclusionary feminists “may actually be guilty of drafting [the Christian Right’s] talking points, adding fuel to the fire of this dangerous anti-trans frenzy.”

And another damning thing said by Meg Kilgannon, excepted from the article Values Voter Summit Panelist: ‘Divide & Conquer’ To Defeat ‘Totalitarian’ Trans Inclusion Policies which was published on October 19th, 2017. It also references the events discussed in the previous article I linked. 

Kilgannon said secular arguments can reach a more diverse audience. Feminism is generally a dirty word among Religious Right activists; at the Values Voter Summit, Dana Loesch declared feminism “dead.” But Kilgannon said that the Hands Across the Aisle Coalition—which describes itself as a group of conservative and progressive women that rise above their differences “to oppose the transgender agenda”—includes feminists who argue that gender identity is the “ultimate misogyny” and “erasure of women.”  She said lesbians in the group are concerned that “transing masculine girls is a form of lesbian eugenics.” Citing shared opposition to gender identity, pornography and prostitution, she quipped, “I had no idea we agreed on so much.”

lesbianchemicalplant

image

lmao

anonymous-les

Okay we need to take the trash out. This is not okay. Conservative Christians do NOT care about the rights of females. They are NOT allies. Also their view on trans people is just hateful. They are indeed against prostitution and porn as well, but not for the same reasons. We don’t want women being exploited. They only care about sexual “purity”. They are misogynists.

lesbianchemicalplant

“we need to take the trash out” you’ve willingly chosen a garbage dump as your hill to die on. Look who you’ve chosen as your comrades. Look in the fucking mirror

Source : pure
fromacomrade
running-batty

It’s that time of year to say no to the Salvation Army.

Never forget they let a Trans woman die instead of helping her.

Never forget they have tossed entire families on the street for having an LGBT child.

Never forget they tell non Christian families that unless they convert they will not help them.

Never forget that the Salvation Army is bigoted and hateful, many of the bell ringers routinely heckle and harass LGBT couples.

ftwobr2000

Annual reblog.

cosmomage

image

In case you’re worried about being rude by ignoring the bell ringers. 

fromacomrade

Fuck the Starvation Army. Give them nothing.

Source : running-batty
left-reminders
stormqueen280:
“ communismisgoodactually:
“ anarchist-bakery:
“ kropotkhristian:
“ satan-but-boring:
“ spooky-blazkowicz:
“ thekiereneffect:
“ left-reminders:
“ Acts 4:32-35
“32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of...
left-reminders

Acts 4:32-35

“32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their property was their own, but they shared everything they had. 33 With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all 34 that there were no needy persons among them. Those who owned land or property sold them, brought the money from the sales 35 and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.”

James 5:1-6

“1 Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you! 2 Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. 3 Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. 4 Look! The wages you failed to pay the workers who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. 5 You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves in the day of slaughter. 6 You have condemned and murdered the innocent one, who was not opposing you.”

Matthew 19:24

“Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter Paradise.“

thekiereneffect

Oh Shit

spooky-blazkowicz

Confirmed, Jesus was a commie. 

satan-but-boring

Better dead than red

kropotkhristian

Yeah they tried that with Jesus, and then he came back three days later.

anarchist-bakery

image

Publié à l'origine par unecarabineadescartes

communismisgoodactually

I love Jesus. I love Jesus the outlaw. Jesus the communist. Jesus the poor. Jesus the homeless. Jesus the non-white vagabond.

I don’t care for the Jesus of the church. The Jesus made up to justify authority and control the masses. White settler Jesus. Not interested

stormqueen280

Jesus was red, pass it on.

Source : kropotkhristian